For permanent magnet export, the magnet grade is only one part of the review. A grade name can describe the expected magnetic performance, but it may not fully show the material route, heavy rare earth content, product form, or export documentation requirement.
This is especially important for Neodymium magnets. Some projects only need standard Neodymium magnets without Dysprosium or Terbium, while other projects require higher coercivity or higher operating temperature resistance. In these cases, the material route may be different. Some designs may use Dysprosium- or Terbium-containing Neodymium magnets, while other designs may be reviewed with HRE-free Neodymium magnets if the required performance can still be achieved.
Composition information is also important. For controlled permanent magnet materials, the key question is not only whether the product is called a magnet, magnetic assembly, or magnetic component. The actual composition, grade, processing form, and intended use may need to be checked together. In practice, a composition report may also be prepared as supporting information when additional confirmation is requested.
Application and destination should also be reviewed before quotation or shipment. The same magnets may be used in ordinary industrial products, motor assemblies, sensors, medical devices, aerospace-related systems, or other applications with different documentation requirements. For magnetic assemblies, the review may also depend on the magnets used inside the assembly, product function, declaration method, and end use.
For this reason, SDM does not recommend confirming permanent magnet export projects only by product name or grade name. A more reliable review should combine magnetic performance, material composition, product form, application, and destination, so the quotation and export process can be handled with fewer uncertainties.